• All submissions to this site are governed by Second Life Project Contribution Agreement. By submitting patches and other information using this site, you acknowledge that you have read, understood, and agreed to those terms.
Issue Details (XML | Word | Printable)

Key: VWR-9659
Type: Bug Bug
Status: Resolved Resolved
Resolution: Needs More Info
Priority: Major Major
Assignee: Unassigned
Reporter: Cedrick Oceanlane
Votes: 0
Watchers: 1
Operations

If you were logged in you would be able to see more operations.
1. Second Life Viewer - VWR

Glow Offset in Snapshots

Created: 08/Oct/08 09:33 PM   Updated: 08/Dec/08 04:26 AM
Return to search
Component/s: Graphics
Affects Version/s: 1.21 Release Candidate
Fix Version/s: None

File Attachments: None
Image Attachments:

1. broken.glow.1024_001.png
(1.41 MB)

2. broken.glow.1150_001.png
(1.80 MB)

3. broken.glow.1200_001.png
(1.96 MB)

4. broken.glow.1280_001.png
(2.29 MB)

5. broken.glow.990_001.png
(1.29 MB)
Environment:
CPU: Intel Core 2 Series Processor (1995 MHz)
Memory: 2046 MB
OS Version: Microsoft Windows Vista Service Pack 1 (Build 6001)
Graphics Card Vendor: ATI Technologies Inc.
Graphics Card: ATI Mobility Radeon X1800
OpenGL Version: 2.1.7659 Release
Monitor Resolution: 1920x1200
Issue Links:
Duplicate
 
Relates
 


 Description  « Hide
When taking a snapshot where the custom size exceeds the screen's resolution in either width or height, the glow is offset in the resulting picture. Now, the obvious fix to this is, don't take a snapshot that has a dimension which exceeds your screensize. However, I figured this would be worth JIRAing, in case it were related to a larger problem, especially considering the fact that the rest of the snapshot looks perfectly normal. I've included graduated snapshots that I took at various resolutions. My screen is 1920x1200, and the default screen size that the snapshot tool wanted to use was 1920x1150. You can see from the screenshots the effect of increasing dimentions. I started out below the limit, to make sure that it wasn't offset in the opposite direction.

Resolutions were as follows:
990x990
1024x1024
1150x1150
1200x1200
1280x1280



 All   Comments   Change History      Sort Order: Ascending order - Click to sort in descending order
Ramzi Linden added a comment - 17/Oct/08 01:37 PM
Hi Cedrick, can you give us two more pieces of information:

a) when you take these screenshots, do you have the option "Show interface in Snapshot" enabled?
b) from your pictures, it looks like the offset only occurs starting at a resolution of 1200x1200 and then again at 1280x1280 . These are the resolutions that exceed your actual screen size. Is this interpretation of your report correct?