• All submissions to this site are governed by Second Life Project Contribution Agreement. By submitting patches and other information using this site, you acknowledge that you have read, understood, and agreed to those terms.
Issue Details (XML | Word | Printable)

Key: VWR-7202
Type: Meta Issue Meta Issue
Status: Open Open
Priority: Normal Normal
Assignee: Unassigned
Reporter: Harleen Gretzky
Votes: 7
Watchers: 2
Operations

If you were logged in you would be able to see more operations.
1. Second Life Viewer - VWR

Meta Issue: Megaprims

Created: 12/May/08 10:43 PM   Updated: 15/Oct/09 07:56 PM
Return to search
Component/s: Building (in-world), User Interface
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: None

Issue Links:
Relates


 Description  « Hide
General meta issue for all things megaprims

 All   Comments   Change History      Sort Order: Ascending order - Click to sort in descending order
Mercia Mcmahon added a comment - 13/May/08 12:03 AM
Shouldn't this be a general meta-issue on mega-prim: this is basically a duplicate of VWR-7197 as it stands.

Harleen Gretzky added a comment - 13/May/08 05:02 AM
No, VWR-7197 has a proposal on how to support it, this is a meta issue and has no proposals. it is just collecting all the proposals do to the lifting of the server restrictions together.

Mercia Mcmahon added a comment - 13/May/08 09:18 AM
Well I don't think this is a proper meta issue so I will add the other mega-prims things anyway. Otherwise this would be resolved as duplicate because collected things together that relate to such a narrow idea is done by linking to that issue not creating a meta-issue.

Harleen Gretzky added a comment - 13/May/08 10:26 PM
Converted to a general meta issue on megaprims since the original issue is moot anyway:

[11:05] Gaius Goodliffe: Are you guys aware that the constraints that used to stop people from making new megaprims are gone?
[11:06] Andrew Linden: Yes Gaius, I heard about that. Kelly Linden fixed it – should go out in the next server update.
[11:06] Gaius Goodliffe: Ah okay.
[11:07] Phli Foxchase: so, it's an exploit ?
[11:07] Andrew Linden: Yes, that 'feature" was really a bug and was unintended