|
|
|
[
Permlink
| « Hide
]
Alissa Sabre added a comment - 11/Apr/08 09:17 AM
Although the attached file is a standalone program but a patch, I checked "Patch attached" so that this issue attracts LL developers attention...
It's great that you've reported this. As of 1.19.1, we do attempt to validate the XML before the publish of an RC0, but sometimes we have failed to do so before RC1, and/or some nodes are missed due to limitations of our internal tool.
I am linking this to a similar internal project, in which we do plan to improve these tools and possibly make them available to the developer community. Very much agreed that clean and thorough naming of the XML nodes is essential to localization efforts by both LL, developers and residents. Not sure how well this is related, but I recently posted a patch to VWR-1719 which also is a standalone tool. The goal was slightly different, refactoring rather than validating, but maybe it can be of interest here, too.
We're actually doing a pretty extensive rework of our internal translation tools this summer. We have a couple of people thinking about it full-time and at least some of those tools will end up either part of the viewer or at least part of the external build. Plans are still being worked out – more details as we have them.
Bumping last triage date forward. Hopefully, we'll have something more definitive the next time we cycle through to talk about this issue.
@Alissa – We're not adding the java app to the source tree, as we won't be using this ourselves. Frustratingly - the tool we're using right now is proprietary.
This tool looks extremely useful. I'd encourage you to add links back to this JIRA to any wiki pages where you think translators could make use of it. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||