• All submissions to this site are governed by Second Life Project Contribution Agreement. By submitting patches and other information using this site, you acknowledge that you have read, understood, and agreed to those terms.
Issue Details (XML | Word | Printable)

Key: VWR-6058
Type: New Feature New Feature
Status: Resolved Resolved
Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: Normal Normal
Assignee: Unassigned
Reporter: Melchoir Tokhes
Votes: 5
Watchers: 2
Operations

If you were logged in you would be able to see more operations.
1. Second Life Viewer - VWR

Option: Do not honor others' attached lights.

Created: 04/Apr/08 04:01 AM   Updated: 08/Jan/09 05:50 AM
Return to search
Component/s: Graphics
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: None

Issue Links:
Duplicate
Relates
 


 Description  « Hide
People who wear face lights /can/ be annoying. I also think it's vain. I also think it's unfair to people and area designers who depend on lights to create the environment's mood.

However, to take this away is to disregard the freedom of expression.

What I propose is simple: A toggle option to set the client to not render lights that are attached to avatars.



 All   Comments   Change History      Sort Order: Ascending order - Click to sort in descending order
Harmony Deschanel added a comment - 27/Sep/08 11:57 PM
This has been started to get worked on, but the way it's done isn't what you're asking for in this Jira .... Here's the "resolved" Jira but they said to submit another to get it worked on. http://jira.secondlife.com/browse/VWR-6540

As I understand the other, all it does right now is to make attached lights black in color, but they still count toward the maximum light sources rendered... I'd like that fixed so they not only don't show, but don't count toward that maximum total either.


Jacek Antonelli added a comment - 28/Sep/08 09:44 AM
This issue is pretty much the same as VWR-6540, except that issue also addresses attached particle emitters, and has a patch that was applied in 1.21. So, I'm resolving this issue as a duplicate of VWR-6540. You can reopen it if you disagree, but I think it would be best to focus on resolving VWR-9393.