|
|
|
The meaning of the checkbox in that search dialog need to be changed from "mature regions" to "mature content".
Why is there a "mature content" checkbox in the parcel flags at all if it's not used? Agree with Argent, there are plenty of Mature regions which have parcels that are perfectly clean and do not promote or condone mature content. Obviously the nature of avatars in the area may change, but on the whole there is no reason to restrict searches because of this.
Perhaps making a prominent (highlighted) note if the parcel/classified/whatever is in a mature simulator so you know this is an acceptable compromise. ^ I certainly find it confusing that the "Mature content" checkbox is broken and that the Search > All tab says "Include Mature content", while Search > Places tab says "Include Mature regions" We've a related internal issue on this:
SL-40097 - "Mature content" checkbox is broken – fix it or remove it My understanding of the Mature Content checkbox in the parcel info is that it relates to the future implementation of "Publish listing on web". I do think it makes much more sense to change that behavior, so that residents with established PG businesses in mature regions can have their parcel listings show up in "mature" filtered searches. Yeah, the "region" may be marked as mature, but does that necessarily mean everything within it is "mature"? We already have an Abuse Reporting mechanism in place that can be used when folks misuse the checkmark.
Then - in Search Places, change the filter to "Include Mature Content" instead of "Places in Mature Regions". The current behavior there assumes that all content is "Mature" by virtue of being in a Mature region. I understand the concept behind this, but the reality out there is something completely different. zk ^ That's similar to what I described internally. Some changes are being made to this which we'll hopefully see soon, but for what's actually described at the root of this issue – does anyone have a solid repro?
I can't reproduce this on either the (0) or (1) build of 1.14.0, in Windows. Is Winter possibly on a Mac?
I am not on a mac. Nor was my friend who also noticed the issue.
AT some point, the setting FINALLY seems to have begun to persist. However.. there was a period of 4 days after "upgrading" to 1.14, that the setting was NOT persisting. One could suggest that it was related to the fact that SL does not exit gracefully.... EVER. and routinely crashes out, or has to have it's processes terminated from the Task Manager. it's quite possible that in those 4 days, that SL had not once ever quit correctly, and therefore kept "losing" the setting. Torley, I saw your comment about SL-40097 above, but couldn't find it in this system or the old one. I'd really love to vote on that. I think it isn't cool for explicit results to show up in the search system when I set it to filter out mature content. Imagine if my kid would be present when that happened?
Wilan, SL-40097 is their internal bug tracker which we lowly residents don't have access to. o.O
Dunno about others, but this issue seems fixed. It does stick between sessions here.
This came up at our UI bug triage today. While I'm not sure who fixed it, several more of us noticed the "Show Mature" setting now persists as appropriate.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous behavior: some checkboxes defaulted to Mature, some didn't. We made it consistent – all default as NOT Mature. Expected behavior is if you check Mature for a given search tab, it should persist across sessions.
I wasn't able to repro this: I checked them all and relogged, and they're still all checked for me in 1.14.0 (1).
Does anyone have a solid repro?