• All submissions to this site are governed by Second Life Project Contribution Agreement. By submitting patches and other information using this site, you acknowledge that you have read, understood, and agreed to those terms.
Issue Details (XML | Word | Printable)

Key: SVC-394
Type: Bug Bug
Status: Closed Closed
Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: Major Major
Assignee: Unassigned
Reporter: Marine Kelley
Votes: 2
Watchers: 0
Operations

If you were logged in you would be able to see more operations.
2. Second Life Service - SVC

SIMs are running at 50% of their previous speed. Grid-wide problem.

Created: 04/Jul/07 02:36 AM   Updated: 04/Jul/07 09:57 AM
Return to search
Component/s: Performance
Affects Version/s: 1.17.0
Fix Version/s: None

File Attachments: None
Image Attachments:

1. 2007-07-04_113057.png
(21 kB)

2. 2007-07-04_114406.png
(21 kB)
Environment: AMD Athlon 2400+, NVidia 6800 GS, Windows 2000
Issue Links:
Duplicate
 


 Description  « Hide
Since the last rolling restart, it seems that all the SIMs are running at half speed. Scripts, physics, everything is running 2x slower than before. I have checked with friends, on many other SIMs, class 3, 4 and 5, and it seems to be grid-wide.

Attached is a screenshot of the performances I get on my home class 5 server, which was running fine before, and that has been restarted only hours ago. I do periodical checks on this one, no particular script is hogging the resources, script time just jumped from a constant 9ms to a constant 18ms.

Please fix this problem quickly, as it's affecting everyone everywhere. And SIM owners certainly won't want to pay the same price for half the resources, without any information or compensation from LL. Thank you !



 All   Comments   Change History      Sort Order: Ascending order - Click to sort in descending order
Marine Kelley added a comment - 04/Jul/07 03:24 AM
Ok my bad. I guess I was a little late on this one, SVC-385 says exactly the same than this one, and it's even "resolved". Thanks to Thomas Conover for pointing me to it.

Lex Neva added a comment - 04/Jul/07 09:43 AM
Your pictures don't really show any significant performance problem. Did you have 4000 Active Scripts before, with only 9ms script time? I'd expect script time to jump by 9ms if a few thousand new scripts showed up.