|
|
|
[
Permlink
| « Hide
]
chorazin allen added a comment - 31/Jul/08 12:24 AM
This is complementary to SVC-1853. Either that should be fixed, or this should be.
Absolutlely no way should this come to pass. Ever. The whole point of llResetScript and llResetOtherScript does not need to be echoed with another function that has a different job to do if it is ever resolved (by resolved I mean fixed not shoved under the carpet).
Nobody in their right mind should vote for this. Honestly it should be closed LL. As the commentary above indicates this (which is indeed a backward step in my view) is only relevant if there is no plan to fix SVC-1853, meaning that the behaviour of llSetScriptState is not predictable - sometimes the script will restart from exactly where and how it was, other times it will be completely virgin with no state, variables or permissions. Since there's no reliable way to determine which is the case, the only answer is to always reset the script. Again - assuming SVC-1853 is not addressed.
This is asking for a change of behavior, thus it is not a bug report.
While I agree with EddyFragment, I wish it hadn't been stated so forcefully. /me gulps. I was young and hot headed. lolz. Learning to play nice now. If LL are going to make the effort to change the code or whatever it is they do to mend bugs, then there would be no point fixing this in such a way as to make it less useful than it should be. If they were to take the time to fix it then making it reliably retain variables and lists etc is surely the best way to mend it. I think that suggesting that any change is a good change is what got me so riled. For that I apologize. However.... (whispers) Don't give LL an option that they just might take that isn't a step in the right direction coughs and looks around furtively. Lets hope for a proper fix before they fully restrict active script quantities.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||