|
|
|
[
Permlink
| « Hide
]
Tyrian Camilo added a comment - 26/May/08 09:42 PM
also ban lists for groups would be helpfull aswell, and repercussions for disobeying group rules
No. I don't see statistics or data here, but I think that
1. spambots are a tiny, tiny minority of free accounts. This solution would punish lots of legit users 2. spambots may circumvent the suggested solution by moving to non-free accounts So, while the problem is likely to exist, I find the suggested solution to be both unacceptable and inefficient. On a different side, this issue should probably be changed to "New feature request". I agree with Opensource on all counts. This will have absolutely no effect on spambots and will only hurt legitimate people. I also agree that this should be a feature request not a bug.
Spam is not legitimate use of resources. We are seeing people have bots join open join groups, spam a message, and quit the group faster than they can be banned or abuse reported. This happens very frequently. This sort of bot is used usually for promoting a business, but we've also seen it use for defamation/libel.
As a solution, given the spam tends to happen via group chat, is to limit the number of groups that unpaid accounts can join/unjoin per day. This will slow down the bots and thus make them less economical to operate. Another awful idea. I'll bite my tongue since my preferred response would probably violate a few JIRA rules but my suggestion is please read what you are posting, what you are suggesting is beyond unreasonable and would cripple usage of SL for thousands of legitimate users, you can not set a strict limit that will stop people from joining and leaving groups without hurting legitimate people and there is no way that people would tolerate even a 1 user tolerance for the system being in error there.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||