History | Log In     View a printable version of the current page.  
  • All submissions to this site are governed by Second Life Project Contribution Agreement. By submitting patches and other information using this site, you acknowledge that you've read, understood, and agreed to those terms.
Issue Details (XML | Word | Printable)

Key: MISC-876
Type: Sub-task Sub-task
Status: Closed Closed
Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: Normal Normal
Assignee: Unassigned
Reporter: kath kanto
Votes: 0
Watchers: 0
Operations

If you were logged in you would be able to see more operations.
4. Second Life Misc Issues - MISC
MISC-208

Group limits cramp freedom of association

Created: 09/Jan/08 08:51 AM   Updated: 27/Mar/08 09:42 PM
Component/s: None
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: None


 Description  « Hide
Groups can be the life-blood of SL for involved avatars. They are a vital means of linking with others. It's similar to having RL restrictions of the number of people one can associate with: cramps freedom.

 All   Comments   Change History      Sort Order: Ascending order - Click to sort in descending order
Lex Neva - 09/Jan/08 10:14 AM
Just a quick note: freedoms granted by a country's constitution don't apply here because LL is not the government. LL can't, for example, impinge on your freedom of speech, because freedom of speech only applies to government censorship.

WarKirby Magojiro - 09/Jan/08 04:09 PM
We all want more groups. Everyone knows that., There are a million reasons.

Please explain what purpose this issue serves ?

Thraxis Epsilon - 10/Jan/08 12:19 AM
This is just a duplicate request of the parent issue of increasing group limit to be more than 25. I am resolving this as a duplicate.

Ryu Darragh - 27/Mar/08 06:24 PM
Thraxis, when you find a duplicate or redundant or related issue, please post the related #s so we can track back to the root article.

Thraxis Epsilon - 27/Mar/08 09:42 PM
This issue is a Sub-Task of MISC-208, and is nothing more then a duplicate of MISC-208, which is the parent of this issue.


The root article was already linked as this was a sub task of the issue it duplicated