Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 28, 2024. It is now read-only.

[BUG-9891] [Feature Request] - llGetObjectDetails() constant OBJECT_CLICK_ACTION #17331

Open
sl-service-account opened this issue Aug 13, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

@sl-service-account
Copy link

Information

Please include the constant OBJECT_CLICK_ACTION with llGetObjectDetails().

This will return an integer matching what was set with llSetClickAction().

I have a few applications that would benefit from this data.

Thanks in advance for any consideration.

Original Jira Fields
Field Value
Issue BUG-9891
Summary [Feature Request] - llGetObjectDetails() constant OBJECT_CLICK_ACTION
Type New Feature Request
Priority Unset
Status Accepted
Resolution Accepted
Reporter Lucia Nightfire (lucia.nightfire)
Created at 2015-08-13T05:23:20Z
Updated at 2015-09-23T04:19:20Z
{
  'Business Unit': ['Platform'],
  'Date of First Response': '2015-09-22T22:34:05.112-0500',
  'How would you like the feature to work?': 'Please include the constant OBJECT_CLICK_ACTION with llGetObjectDetails().\r\n\r\nThis will return an integer matching what was set with llSetClickAction().\r\n\r\nI have a few applications that would benefit from this data.\r\n\r\nThanks in advance for any consideration.',
  'ReOpened Count': 0.0,
  'Severity': 'Unset',
  'Target Viewer Version': 'viewer-development',
  'Why is this feature important to you? How would it benefit the community?': '?',
}
@sl-service-account
Copy link
Author

Strife Onizuka commented at 2015-09-23T03:34:05Z, updated at 2015-09-23T03:35:03Z

Wow, LL really has turned over a new leaf. Two months for a feature suggestion is amazing!

@sl-service-account
Copy link
Author

Lucia Nightfire commented at 2015-09-23T04:19:21Z

This, along with BUG-9683 are a fluke as they jumped a backlog of accepted feature requests. I wouldn't expect any more for the rest of the year, heh.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant